Google organic
The classic blue links, and the position they hold once the rest of the page is assembled around them.
Search & AI Visibility scores your presence on nine surfaces every month: Google organic, the local pack, Maps, ads, and AI Overview, then ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity. Every competitor is scored on the same curve.
| Tracked term | Organic | AIO | GPT | Claude |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| keyword corporate card | 1 | 1 | ||
| keyword best expense management software | 4 | 2 | ||
| keyword virtual corporate card | 4 | 3 | ||
| keyword ramp pricing | 1 | – | ||
| prompt Ramp vs Expensify - which is better for expense reports? | 1 | 1 | ||
| prompt Which corporate card platform has the best virtual cards for online spending? | 2 | – | ||
| prompt Is Ramp good for accounts payable or should I use a dedicated AP tool? | – | 1 | ||
| prompt What are the best alternatives to Brex? | 3 | ○ |
Eight real queries from one live report. On “ramp pricing” this brand holds the top organic result while Google's own AI Overview answers above it without naming them. Rank tracking reads the first column.
| Keyword | Organic | AI Overview | ChatGPT | Claude | Gemini | Perplexity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| keyword corporate card | 1 | 1 | ||||
| keyword best expense management software | 4 | 2 | ||||
| keyword virtual corporate card | 4 | 3 | ||||
| keyword ramp pricing | 1 | – | ||||
| prompt Ramp vs Expensify - which is better for expense reports? | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | ||
| prompt Which corporate card platform has the best virtual cards for online spending? | 2 | – | 10 | ○ | ||
| prompt Is Ramp good for accounts payable or should I use a dedicated AP tool? | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| prompt What are the best alternatives to Brex? | 3 | – | ○ | 6 |
A buying question gets answered in a dozen places now, and most of them never show ten blue links. We record who appeared, in what position, and who was cited, on every one of them.
The classic blue links, and the position they hold once the rest of the page is assembled around them.
The three-business pack that decides who gets the call, and Maps as its own discovery engine. We count only the visible top three.
Google's generated answer above the results, and the handful of sources it cites. A #3 ranking sits below it, and the searcher may never scroll.
Real prompts, run monthly against each assistant, scored on whether you are named in the answer and where.
A #1 counts fully and position 8 counts for a fraction, on a real click-through curve. A term 12,000 people search counts for more than one searched 40 times. What comes out is a number that survives scrutiny.
Share of every answer available across Google and AI, weighted by where the search demand sits.
Organic, local pack, and AI Overview, scored on the same curve as everything else.
Across the four assistants buyers are already asking. Measured monthly against real prompts.
A real report: ramp.com, Jul 27 2026, 490 results across the United States.
Both numbers come from the same run, for the same brand, on the same day. Rank tracking reports the second one.
Share of voice per surface, strongest first.
Top entities by overall share of voice, computed identically to yours.
Monthly. Each run re-queries every tracked term across every tracked surface and location, and the results are stored so the trend lines are real measurements rather than something reconstructed later. Each run is a dated point-in-time scrape, and we say so plainly because the honesty is the product.
Your rank- and volume-weighted share of all the visibility available for your topics, from 0 to 100%. A #1 appearance counts fully and a deeper position counts for less, on a realistic click-through curve. A keyword 12,000 people search counts for more than one searched 40 times. Your competitors are scored identically, so the numbers reconcile.
We record it as its own state. There is a real difference between a competitor being named instead of you, which is a gap you can close, and nobody being named at all, which was never an opportunity. Collapsing both into one empty cell is what inflates a score.
The report labels its own noise floor. Movement under two points against the comparison run reads as steady, and we mark it that way rather than selling you a rounding error as progress.
Yes. Local results and the assistants that answer per-location are scraped per location, so a multi-location business sees the truth for each place it operates instead of a blurred national average.
A client-ready report on screen, plus a branded PDF and Excel exports. Overview, per-platform pages for Google and each AI assistant, competitive leaderboards, topic leadership, the full keyword and prompt inventory with volumes, the sources AI cites most, and the sub-questions it asks while answering.
We will run your market across all nine surfaces and walk you through the report: where you show up, which brands are named alongside you, and where the gaps sit.